Berg: No good in al-Zarqawi's death

Just as Ann Coulter discusses the "Liberals' Doctrine of Infallibility" and how no one dare question the group of anti-Bush widows from 9/11 or Cindy Sheehan, Michael Berg falls into the same group:

"Berg said 'restorative justice,' - such as being forced to work in a hospital where maimed children are treated - could have made al-Zarqawi 'a decent human being. 'Now that he's dead, that's not a possibility,' he said."

This man may feel better calling himself a 'pacifist' and the media may oblige him - for their own reasons - but what he truly is, is an anarchist. And since his anarchy is targeted at the US and what the US stands for, he could further be described as a socialist - perhaps, communist (in the Stalin, Mao, and Fidel mold). I don't wish to resort to name-calling. I believe Mr Berg would agree with my description of him. His interview this morning on CNN demonstrates that he is not a pacifist. He does not see both sides of the violence as culpable. He repeatedly attacked George Bush and the US claiming Iraq is worse off under "King George" than under Hussein and that more people are dying because of the US than were dying before.

Yes. Innocent Iraqis are dying. Far more of them at the hands of Iraqi and other fundamental terrorists than US actions. Innocents are also dying at these terrorists in other places throughout the world - the Sudan, Somalia, the Gaza strip, SE Asia, Afghanistan, etc. These people are not dying because the US is killing them, they are dying because they don't want to live under the thumb of the terrorists and their fundamental beliefs. The innocents are dying because they want freedom - what the US stands for!